ca379311b8
Includes spec, plan, research, data model, contracts, and quickstart guide for mautrix-slack Socket Mode bridge deployment.
98 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
98 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Matrix-Slack Bridge Integration
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2025-10-22
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Validation Results
|
|
|
|
**Status**: ✅ ALL CHECKS PASSED
|
|
|
|
### Detailed Review
|
|
|
|
#### Content Quality
|
|
- ✅ Specification avoids mentioning specific technologies (NixOS, PostgreSQL mentioned only as dependencies, not implementation)
|
|
- ✅ Focus remains on user outcomes: message delivery, reliability, configuration
|
|
- ✅ Language accessible to non-technical stakeholders (business-focused success criteria)
|
|
- ✅ All mandatory sections present: User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
#### Requirement Completeness
|
|
- ✅ Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers (all decisions made based on context)
|
|
- ✅ All 15 functional requirements are testable (can verify message relay, timing, auth, etc.)
|
|
- ✅ Success criteria measurable with specific metrics (5 second delivery, 99% uptime, etc.)
|
|
- ✅ Success criteria technology-agnostic (focused on user experience, not tech stack)
|
|
- ✅ 16 acceptance scenarios across 4 user stories provide comprehensive coverage
|
|
- ✅ 7 edge cases identified with expected behaviors
|
|
- ✅ Scope explicitly defines what's in/out with rationale
|
|
- ✅ Dependencies documented across technical, external, and process categories
|
|
|
|
#### Feature Readiness
|
|
- ✅ FR-001 through FR-015 map to user stories and acceptance criteria
|
|
- ✅ Four prioritized user stories (P1-P3) cover core flows: Slack→Matrix, Matrix→Slack, reliability, configuration
|
|
- ✅ Eight success criteria directly measurable without implementation knowledge
|
|
- ✅ No technical leakage: "Socket Mode" and "sops-nix" appropriately mentioned as requirements, not implementation details
|
|
|
|
### Assumptions Validated
|
|
|
|
The specification makes informed assumptions about:
|
|
- Message volume (< 1000/day per channel) - reasonable for small team
|
|
- Channel count (< 10 initially) - appropriate for MVP
|
|
- Network reliability (>99%) - standard expectation
|
|
- No historical import needed - MVP can start fresh
|
|
- Manual testing sufficient - matches "build it right" philosophy
|
|
|
|
These assumptions are explicitly documented in the Assumptions section.
|
|
|
|
### Scope Clarity
|
|
|
|
In-scope and out-of-scope items clearly delineated:
|
|
- Core bidirectional messaging: IN SCOPE
|
|
- Advanced features (threads, reactions, editing): OUT OF SCOPE (explicitly deferred)
|
|
- Single workspace focus: IN SCOPE
|
|
- Multi-workspace: OUT OF SCOPE
|
|
|
|
This provides clear boundaries for implementation.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Specification is complete and ready for planning phase
|
|
- No clarifications needed from user (all decisions made with reasonable defaults)
|
|
- Feature aligns with Platform Vision Milestone 1
|
|
- Dependencies clearly identified for implementation planning
|
|
- Edge cases provide guidance for error handling design
|
|
|
|
## Recommendation
|
|
|
|
**PROCEED TO PLANNING**: Specification meets all quality criteria and is ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|
|
|
|
The spec successfully balances:
|
|
- Completeness (all required information present)
|
|
- Clarity (unambiguous requirements)
|
|
- Feasibility (realistic scope for MVP)
|
|
- Flexibility (identified future enhancements)
|