skills/.beads/issues.jsonl

{"id":"skills-0og","title":"spec-review: Define output capture and audit trail","description":"Reviews happen in terminal then disappear. No audit trail, no diffable history.\n\nAdd:\n- Guidance to tee output to review file (e.g., specs/{branch}/review.md)\n- Standard location for gate check results\n- Template for recording decisions and rationale","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:23.705164812-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:23.705164812-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-1ig","title":"Brainstorm agent-friendly doc conventions","description":"# Agent-Friendly Doc Conventions - Hybrid Architecture\n\n## FINAL ARCHITECTURE: Vale + LLM Hybrid\n\n### Insight\n\u003e \"Good old deterministic testing (dumb robots) is the best way to keep in check LLMs (smart robots) at volume.\"\n\n### Split by Tool\n\n| Category | Rubrics | Tool |\n|----------|---------|------|\n| Vale-only | Format Integrity, Deterministic Instructions, Terminology Strictness, Token Efficiency | Fast, deterministic, CI-friendly |\n| Vale + LLM | Semantic Headings, Configuration Precision, Security Boundaries | Vale flags, LLM suggests fixes |\n| LLM-only | Contextual Independence, Code Executability, Execution Verification | Semantic understanding required |\n\n### Pipeline\n\n```\n┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n│ Stage 1: Vale (deterministic, fast, free)                   │\n│ - Runs in CI on every commit                                │\n│ - Catches 40% of issues instantly                           │\n│ - No LLM cost for clean docs                                │\n└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘\n                      │ only if Vale passes\n                      ▼\n┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n│ Stage 2: LLM Triage (cheap model)                           │\n│ - Evaluates 3 semantic rubrics                              │\n│ - Identifies which need patches                             │\n└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘\n                      │ only if issues found\n                      ▼\n┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n│ Stage 3: LLM Specialists (capable model)                    │\n│ - One agent per failed rubric                               │\n│ - Generates patches                                         │\n└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n```\n\n### Why This Works\n- Vale is battle-tested, fast, CI-native\n- LLM only fires when needed (adaptive cost)\n- Deterministic rules catch predictable issues\n- LLM handles semantic/contextual issues\n\n---\n\n## Vale Rules Needed\n\n### Format Integrity\n- Existence: code blocks without language tags\n- Regex for unclosed fences\n\n### Deterministic Instructions  \n- Existence: hedging words (\"might\", \"may want to\", \"consider\", \"you could\")\n\n### Terminology Strictness\n- Consistency: flag term variations\n\n### Token Efficiency\n- Existence: filler phrases (\"In this section we will...\", \"As you may know...\")\n\n### Semantic Headings (partial)\n- Existence: banned headings (\"Overview\", \"Introduction\", \"Getting Started\")\n\n### Configuration Precision (partial)\n- Existence: vague versions (\"Python 3.x\", \"recent version\")\n\n### Security Boundaries (partial)\n- Existence: hardcoded API key patterns\n\n---\n\n## NEXT STEPS\n\n1. Create Vale style for doc-review rubrics\n2. Test Vale on sample docs\n3. Design LLM prompts for semantic rubrics only\n4. Wire into orch or standalone","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-04T14:02:04.898026177-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-04T16:43:53.0608948-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-04T16:43:53.0608948-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-20s","title":"Compare BOUNDARIES.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.585115099-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:28.442646801-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:28.442646801-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-20s","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.586442134-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-25l","title":"Create orch skill for multi-model consensus","description":"Build a skill that exposes orch CLI capabilities to agents for querying multiple AI models","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-30T15:43:49.209528963-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T15:47:36.608887453-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-30T15:47:36.608887453-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-2xo","title":"Add README.md for web-search skill","description":"web-search skill has SKILL.md and scripts but no README.md. AGENTS.md says README.md is for humans, contains installation instructions, usage examples, prerequisites.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:14.26066025-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:00:25.561281052-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-2xo","depends_on_id":"skills-vb5","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-30T12:01:30.240439018-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-39g","title":"RFC: .skills manifest pattern for per-repo skill deployment","description":"Document the .skills file pattern where projects declare skills in a manifest, .envrc reads it, and agents can query/edit it.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-30T12:37:50.106992381-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:43:04.155161727-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-30T12:43:04.155161727-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-3o7","title":"Fix ai-skills.nix missing sha256 hash","description":"modules/ai-skills.nix:16 has empty sha256 placeholder for opencode-skills npm package. Either get actual hash or remove/comment out the incomplete fetchFromNpm approach.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:24.404929863-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:12:39.372107348-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-30T12:12:39.372107348-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-4pw","title":"spec-review: Expand NFR checklist in prompts","description":"Current prompts mention 'performance, security, accessibility' but miss many critical NFRs.\n\nExpand to include:\n- Security (authn/authz, secrets, threat model)\n- Privacy/compliance (GDPR, PII)\n- Observability (logging, metrics, tracing)\n- Reliability (SLOs, failure modes)\n- Rollout/rollback strategy\n- Migration/backfill\n- Data retention/lifecycle\n- Cost constraints","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:24.485420922-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:24.485420922-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-4yn","title":"Decide on screenshot-latest skill deployment","description":"DEPLOYED.md shows screenshot-latest as 'Not yet deployed - Pending decision'. Low risk skill that finds existing files. Need to decide whether to deploy or archive.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:33.099790809-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:33.099790809-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-53k","title":"Design graph-based doc discovery","description":"How does doc-review find and traverse documentation?\n\nApproach: Start from README.md or AGENTS.md, graph out from there.\n\nDesign questions:\n- Parse markdown links to find related docs?\n- Follow only relative links or also section references?\n- How to handle circular references?\n- Depth limit or exhaustive traversal?\n- What about orphan docs not linked from root?\n- How to represent the graph for chunking decisions?\n\nConsiderations:\n- Large repos may have hundreds of markdown files\n- Not all .md files are \"documentation\" (changelogs, templates, etc.)\n- Some docs are generated and shouldn't be patched\n\nDeliverable: Algorithm/pseudocode for doc discovery + chunking strategy.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-04T14:02:13.316843518-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-04T16:43:58.277061015-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-04T16:43:58.277061015-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-5hb","title":"spec-review: Add Prerequisites section documenting dependencies","description":"SKILL.md and process docs assume orch is installed, prompt files exist, models are available, but none of this is documented.\n\nAdd:\n- orch install instructions/link\n- Required env vars and model availability\n- Prompt file locations\n- Expected repo structure (specs/ convention)\n- Troubleshooting section for common failures","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:23.030537501-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:23.030537501-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-5v8","title":"Replace SKILL.md with upstream version","description":"Upstream has 644 lines vs our 122. Missing: self-test questions, notes quality checks, token checkpointing, database selection, field usage table, lifecycle workflow, common patterns, troubleshooting","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.025829293-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:16:20.470185004-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:16:20.470185004-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-5v8","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.027601712-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-5vg","title":"spec-review: Add context/assumptions step to prompts","description":"Reviews can become speculative without establishing context first.\n\nAdd to prompts:\n- List assumptions being made\n- Distinguish: missing from doc vs implied vs out of scope\n- Ask clarifying questions if critical context missing","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:25.681448596-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:25.681448596-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-6jw","title":"spec-review: Add severity labeling to prompts and reviews","description":"Reviews produce flat lists mixing blockers with minor nits. Hard to make decisions.\n\nAdd to prompts:\n- Require severity labels: Blocker / High / Medium / Low\n- Sort output by severity\n- Include impact and likelihood for each issue","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:23.334156366-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:23.334156366-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-7s0","title":"Compare STATIC_DATA.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:55.193704589-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:29.659256809-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:29.659256809-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-7s0","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:55.195160705-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-7sh","title":"Set up bd-issue-tracking Claude Code skill from beads repo","description":"Install the beads Claude Code skill from https://github.com/steveyegge/beads/tree/main/examples/claude-code-skill\n\nThis skill teaches Claude how to effectively use beads for issue tracking across multi-session coding workflows. It provides strategic guidance on when/how to use beads, not just command syntax.\n\nFiles to install to ~/.claude/skills/bd-issue-tracking/:\n- SKILL.md - Core workflow patterns and decision criteria\n- BOUNDARIES.md - When to use beads vs markdown alternatives\n- CLI_REFERENCE.md - Complete command documentation\n- DEPENDENCIES.md - Relationship types and patterns\n- WORKFLOWS.md - Step-by-step procedures\n- ISSUE_CREATION.md - Quality guidelines\n- RESUMABILITY.md - Making work resumable across sessions\n- STATIC_DATA.md - Using beads as reference databases\n\nCan symlink or copy the files. Restart Claude Code after install.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T17:53:43.254007992-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:04:53.416579381-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:04:53.416579381-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-8d4","title":"Compare CLI_REFERENCE.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.268324087-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:17:26.552616779-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:17:26.552616779-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-8d4","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.27265681-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-9af","title":"spec-review: Add spike/research task handling","description":"Tasks like 'Investigate X' can linger without clear outcomes.\n\nAdd to REVIEW_TASKS:\n- Flag research/spike tasks\n- Require timebox and concrete outputs (decision record, prototype, risks)\n- Pattern for handling unknowns","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.887719136-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.887719136-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-a0x","title":"spec-review: Add traceability requirements across artifacts","description":"Prompts don't enforce spec → plan → tasks linkage. Drift can occur without detection.\n\nAdd:\n- Require trace matrix or linkage in reviews\n- Each plan item should reference spec requirement\n- Each task should reference plan item\n- Flag unmapped items and extra scope","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:25.270581198-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:25.270581198-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-a23","title":"Update main README to list all 9 skills","description":"Main README.md 'Skills Included' section only lists worklog and update-spec-kit. Repo actually has 9 skills: template, worklog, update-spec-kit, screenshot-latest, niri-window-capture, tufte-press, update-opencode, web-research, web-search.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:14.042397754-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:00:18.916270858-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-a23","depends_on_id":"skills-4yn","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-30T12:01:30.306742184-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-al5","title":"Consider repo-setup-verification skill","description":"The dotfiles repo has a repo-setup-prompt.md verification checklist that could become a skill.\n\n**Source**: ~/proj/dotfiles/docs/repo-setup-prompt.md\n\n**What it does**:\n- Verifies .envrc has use_api_keys and skills loading\n- Checks .skills manifest exists with appropriate skills\n- Optionally checks beads setup\n- Verifies API keys are loaded\n\n**As a skill it could**:\n- Be invoked to audit any repo's agent setup\n- Offer to fix missing pieces\n- Provide consistent onboarding for new repos\n\n**Questions**:\n- Is this better as a skill vs a slash command?\n- Should it auto-fix or just report?\n- Does it belong in skills repo or dotfiles?","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-06T12:38:32.561337354-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-06T12:38:32.561337354-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-bcu","title":"Design doc-review skill","description":"# doc-review skill\n\nFight documentation drift with a non-interactive review process that generates patchfiles for human review.\n\n## Problem\n- No consistent documentation system across repos\n- Stale content accumulates\n- Structural inconsistencies (docs not optimized for agents)\n\n## Envisioned Workflow\n\n```bash\n# Phase 1: Generate patches (non-interactive, use spare credits, test models)\ndoc-review scan ~/proj/foo --model claude-sonnet --output /tmp/foo-patches/\n\n# Phase 2: Review patches (interactive session)\ncd ~/proj/foo\nclaude  # human reviews patches, applies selectively\n```\n\n## Design Decisions Made\n\n- **Trigger**: Manual invocation (not CI). Use case includes burning extra LLM credits, testing models repeatably.\n- **Source of truth**: Style guide embedded in prompt template. Blessed defaults, overridable per-repo.\n- **Output**: Patchfiles for human review in interactive Claude session.\n- **Chunking**: Based on absolute size, not file count. Logical chunks easy for Claude to review.\n- **Scope detection**: Graph-based discovery starting from README.md or AGENTS.md, not glob-all-markdown.\n\n## Open Design Work\n\n### Agent-Friendly Doc Conventions (needs brainstorming)\nWhat makes docs agent-readable?\n- Explicit context (no \"as mentioned above\")\n- Clear section headers for navigation\n- Self-contained sections\n- Consistent terminology\n- Front-loaded summaries\n- ???\n\n### Prompt Content\nFull design round needed on:\n- What conventions to enforce\n- How to express them in prompt\n- Examples of \"good\" vs \"bad\"\n\n### Graph-Based Discovery\nHow does traversal work?\n- Parse links from README/AGENTS.md?\n- Follow relative markdown links?\n- Depth limit?\n\n## Skill Structure (tentative)\n```\nskills/doc-review/\n├── prompt.md           # Core review instructions + style guide\n├── scan.sh             # Orchestrates: find docs → invoke claude → emit patches\n└── README.md\n```\n\n## Out of Scope (for now)\n- Cross-repo standardization (broader than skills repo)\n- CI integration\n- Auto-apply without human review","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-12-04T14:01:43.305653729-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-04T16:44:03.468118288-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-04T16:44:03.468118288-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-bcu","depends_on_id":"skills-1ig","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-12-04T14:02:17.144414636-08:00","created_by":"daemon"},{"issue_id":"skills-bcu","depends_on_id":"skills-53k","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-12-04T14:02:17.164968463-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-bvz","title":"spec-review: Add Definition of Ready checklists for each phase","description":"'Ready for /speckit.plan' and similar are underspecified.\n\nAdd concrete checklists:\n- Spec ready for planning: problem statement, goals, constraints, acceptance criteria, etc.\n- Plan ready for tasks: milestones, risks, dependencies, test strategy, etc.\n- Tasks ready for bd: each task has acceptance criteria, dependencies explicit, etc.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:24.877531852-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:24.877531852-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-cc0","title":"spec-review: Add anti-hallucination constraints to prompts","description":"Models may paraphrase and present as quotes, or invent requirements/risks not in the doc.\n\nAdd:\n- 'Quotes must be verbatim'\n- 'Do not assume technologies/constraints not stated'\n- 'If missing info, list as open questions rather than speculating'","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.045478292-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.045478292-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-cjx","title":"Create spec-review skill for orch + spec-kit integration","description":"A new skill that integrates orch multi-model consensus with spec-kit workflows.\n\n**Purpose**: Use different models/temps/stances to review spec-kit artifacts before phase transitions.\n\n**Proposed commands**:\n- /spec-review.spec - Critique current spec for completeness, ambiguity, gaps\n- /spec-review.plan - Evaluate architecture decisions in plan\n- /spec-review.gate - Go/no-go consensus before phase transition\n\n**Structure**:\n```\nskills/spec-review/\n├── SKILL.md\n├── commands/\n│   ├── spec.md\n│   ├── plan.md\n│   └── gate.md\n└── prompts/\n    └── ...\n```\n\n**Key design points**:\n- Finds spec/plan files from current branch or specs/ directory\n- Invokes orch with appropriate prompt, models, stances\n- Presents consensus/critique results\n- AI reviewing AI is valuable redundancy (different models/temps/stances)\n\n**Dependencies**:\n- orch CLI must be available (blocked on dotfiles-3to)\n- spec-kit project structure conventions","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-12-14T17:50:13.22879874-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:10:23.122342449-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-15T00:10:23.122342449-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-cnc","title":"Add direnv helper for per-repo skill deployment","description":"Create sourceable helper script and documentation for the standard per-repo skill deployment pattern using direnv + nix build.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-11-30T12:19:20.71056749-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:37:47.22638278-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-30T12:37:47.22638278-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-czz","title":"Research OpenCode agents for skill integration","description":"DEPLOYMENT.md:218 has TODO to research OpenCode agents. Need to understand how Build/Plan/custom agents work and whether skills need agent-specific handling.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:24.855701141-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:24.855701141-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-d6r","title":"Design: orch as local agent framework","description":"# Orch Evolution: From Consensus Tool to Agent Framework\n\n## Current State\n- `orch consensus` - multi-model queries\n- `orch chat` - single model queries\n- No state, no pipelines, no retries\n\n## Proposed Extensions\n\n### Pipeline Mode\n```bash\norch pipeline config.yaml\n```\nWhere config.yaml defines:\n- Stages (triage → specialists → verify)\n- Routing logic (if triage finds X, run specialist Y)\n- Retry policy\n\n### Evaluate Mode (doc-review specific)\n```bash\norch evaluate doc.md --rubrics=1,4,7 --output=patches/\n```\n- Applies specific rubrics to document\n- Outputs JSON or patches\n\n### Parallel Mode\n```bash\norch parallel --fan-out=5 --template=\"evaluate {rubric}\" rubrics.txt\n```\n- Fan-out to multiple parallel calls\n- Aggregate results\n\n## Open Questions\n1. Does this belong in orch or a separate tool?\n2. Should orch pipelines be YAML-defined or code-defined?\n3. How does this relate to Claude Code Task subagents?\n4. What's the minimal viable extension?\n\n## Context\nEmerged from doc-review skill design - need multi-pass evaluation but don't want to adopt heavy framework (LangGraph, etc.)","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-04T16:06:56.681282678-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-04T16:44:08.652185174-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-04T16:44:08.652185174-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-d87","title":"orch skill is documentation-only, needs working invocation mechanism","description":"The orch skill provides SKILL.md documentation but no working invocation mechanism.\n\n**Resolution**: Install orch globally via home-manager (dotfiles-3to). The skill documents a system tool, doesn't need to bundle it.\n\n**Blocked by**: dotfiles-3to (Add orch CLI to home-manager packages)","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-12-14T11:54:03.157039164-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-14T12:05:26.427975702-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-dpw","title":"orch: add command to show available/configured models","description":"## Problem\n\nWhen trying to use orch, you have to trial-and-error through models to find which ones have API keys configured. Each failure looks like:\n\n```\nError: GEMINI_API_KEY not set. Required for Google Gemini models.\n```\n\nNo way to know upfront which models are usable.\n\n## Proposed Solution\n\nAdd `orch models` or `orch status` command:\n\n```bash\n$ orch models\nAvailable models:\n  ✓ flash      (GEMINI_API_KEY set)\n  ✓ gemini     (GEMINI_API_KEY set)\n  ✗ deepseek   (OPENROUTER_KEY not set)\n  ✗ qwen       (OPENROUTER_KEY not set)\n  ✓ gpt        (OPENAI_API_KEY set)\n```\n\nOr at minimum, on failure suggest alternatives:\n```\nError: GEMINI_API_KEY not set. Try --model gpt or --model deepseek instead.\n```\n\n## Context\n\nHit this while trying to brainstorm with high-temp gemini - had to try 4 models before realizing none were configured in this environment.","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-12-04T14:10:07.069103175-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-04T14:11:05.49122538-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-04T14:11:05.49122538-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-ebh","title":"Compare bd-issue-tracking skill files with upstream","description":"Fetch upstream beads skill files and compare with our condensed versions to identify differences","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:14:07.886535859-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:37.579815337-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:37.579815337-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-fo3","title":"Compare WORKFLOWS.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:54.283175561-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:28.897037199-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:28.897037199-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-fo3","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:54.286009672-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-fvx","title":"use-skills.sh: stderr from nix build corrupts symlinks when repo is dirty","description":"In use-skills.sh, the line:\n\n```bash\nout=$(nix build --print-out-paths --no-link \"${SKILLS_REPO}#${skill}\" 2\u003e\u00261) || {\n```\n\nThe `2\u003e\u00261` merges stderr into stdout. When the skills repo is dirty, nix emits a warning to stderr which gets captured into $out and used as the symlink target.\n\nResult: symlinks like:\n```\norch -\u003e warning: Git tree '/home/dan/proj/skills' is dirty\n/nix/store/j952hgxixifscafb42vmw9vgdphi1djs-ai-skill-orch\n```\n\nFix: redirect stderr to /dev/null or filter it out before creating symlink.","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-12-14T11:54:03.06502295-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-14T11:59:25.472044754-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-14T11:59:25.472044754-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-gas","title":"spec-review: File discovery is brittle, can pick wrong file silently","description":"The fallback `find ... | head -1` is non-deterministic and can select wrong spec/plan/tasks file without user noticing. Branch names with `/` also break path construction.\n\nFixes:\n- Fail fast if expected file missing\n- Print chosen file path before proceeding\n- Require explicit confirmation if falling back\n- Handle branch names with slashes","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:22.762045913-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:22.762045913-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-h9f","title":"spec-review: Balance negativity bias in prompts","description":"'Be critical' and 'devil's advocate' can bias toward over-flagging without acknowledging what's good.\n\nAdd:\n- 'List top 3 strongest parts of the document'\n- 'Call out where document is sufficiently clear/testable'\n- Categorize :against concerns as confirmed/plausible/rejected","status":"open","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.418087998-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.418087998-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-kmj","title":"Orch skill: document or handle orch not in PATH","description":"Skill docs show 'orch consensus' but orch requires 'uv run' from ~/proj/orch. Either update skill to invoke correctly or document installation requirement.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-01T17:29:48.844997238-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-01T18:28:11.374048504-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-01T18:28:11.374048504-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-lie","title":"Compare DEPENDENCIES.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.925914243-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:28.665641809-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:28.665641809-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-lie","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:53.9275694-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-lvg","title":"Compare ISSUE_CREATION.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:54.609282051-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:29.134966356-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:29.134966356-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-lvg","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:54.610717055-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-m21","title":"Apply niri-window-capture code review recommendations","description":"CODE-REVIEW-niri-window-capture.md identifies action items: add dependency checks to scripts, improve error handling for niri failures, add screenshot directory validation, implement rate limiting. See High/Medium priority sections.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:24.648846875-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:24.648846875-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-mx3","title":"spec-review: Define consensus thresholds and decision rules","description":"'Use judgment' for mixed results leads to inconsistent decisions.\n\nDefine:\n- What constitutes consensus (2/3? unanimous?)\n- How to handle NEUTRAL votes\n- Tie-break rules\n- When human override is acceptable and how to document it","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:24.121175736-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:24.121175736-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-pu4","title":"Clean up stale beads.left.jsonl merge artifact","description":"bd doctor flagged multiple JSONL files. beads.left.jsonl is empty merge artifact that should be removed: git rm .beads/beads.left.jsonl","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:33.292221449-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:37:49.916795223-08:00","closed_at":"2025-11-30T12:37:49.916795223-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-qeh","title":"Add README.md for web-research skill","description":"web-research skill has SKILL.md and scripts but no README.md. AGENTS.md says README.md is for humans, contains installation instructions, usage examples, prerequisites.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:14.475647113-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T12:00:30.309340468-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-qeh","depends_on_id":"skills-vb5","type":"blocks","created_at":"2025-11-30T12:01:30.278784381-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-uz4","title":"Compare RESUMABILITY.md with upstream","description":"","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:54.897754095-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:29.384645842-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-03T20:19:29.384645842-08:00","dependencies":[{"issue_id":"skills-uz4","depends_on_id":"skills-ebh","type":"discovered-from","created_at":"2025-12-03T20:15:54.899671178-08:00","created_by":"daemon"}]}
{"id":"skills-vb5","title":"Resolve web search design questions","description":"web_search_brainstorm.md has unanswered design questions: single smart skill vs explicit flags, specific sources priority, raw links vs summaries. Need user input to finalize web-search/web-research direction.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:33.482270742-08:00","updated_at":"2025-11-30T11:58:33.482270742-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-x2l","title":"Investigate hooks for parallel orch queries","description":"When using orch skill, it would be useful to spin off multiple model queries in parallel automatically (e.g., gemini + gpt simultaneously). Explore if Claude Code hooks can trigger parallel background processes when the orch skill is invoked.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"feature","created_at":"2025-12-06T19:29:00.165752425-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-06T19:29:00.165752425-08:00"}