#+TITLE: Vision Benchmark, Orch Patterns, and Claude Search Prototype #+DATE: 2025-12-29 #+KEYWORDS: vision-benchmark, orch-skill, claude-search, lsp-research, issue-triage, hooks #+COMMITS: 5 #+COMPRESSION_STATUS: uncompressed * Session Summary ** Date: 2025-12-29 (Evening session, continuation from morning) ** Focus Area: Issue triage, research tasks, and prototype development * Accomplishments - [X] Completed vision model UI understanding benchmark (skills-ebl) - [X] Added conversational patterns documentation to orch skill (skills-8d9) - [X] Investigated Claude Code hooks for parallel orch queries (skills-x2l) - [X] Built claude-search prototype for conversation history search (skills-6e3) - [X] Verified ARGS variable usage - closed invalid issue (skills-8cc) - [X] Evaluated shared logging library need - closed as not worth it (skills-r5c) - [X] Created dotfiles-0l3 for AT-SPI enablement (cross-repo tracking) - [X] Researched Claude Code LSP integration architecture * Key Decisions ** Decision 1: Vision models best used in hybrid approach with AT-SPI - Context: Benchmarking how well vision models understand UI screenshots - Test cases: Element location, identification, state detection, text extraction, layout - Findings: 1. Excellent at text extraction and semantic understanding 2. Approximate coordinates only (regions, not pixels) 3. Good state detection (filled/empty, checked/unchecked) - Rationale: Vision excels at semantics, AT-SPI provides precision - Impact: Desktop automation should use hybrid approach ** Decision 2: Hooks unsuitable for automatic parallel orch queries - Context: Could hooks automatically spin off orch queries? - Research findings: 1. Hooks are synchronous and blocking (60s timeout) 2. Cannot run true background processes 3. Would block Claude agent while waiting - Rationale: orch consensus already runs models in parallel internally - Impact: Explicit skill invocation is the right pattern, not hooks ** Decision 3: Claude search - extract existing summaries, don't generate - Context: Making conversation history searchable - Discovery: Claude Code JSONL files already contain summary entries - Approach: Index existing summaries + metadata vs generating new ones - Impact: Simple grep-based search works well, AI summarization unnecessary ** Decision 4: Shared logging library not worth the overhead - Context: Issue claimed duplicated logging functions across scripts - Investigation: Only 2 files have logging, with different styles - Rationale: Shared library adds complexity without proportional benefit - Impact: Keep logging inline in each script ** Decision 5: Cross-repo work should be filed as separate beads - Context: AT-SPI enablement requires dotfiles NixOS changes - User feedback: "modifying system config is out-of-scope, file a beads issue" - Action: Created dotfiles-0l3, reverted direct changes - Impact: Better tracking of cross-repo dependencies * Problems & Solutions | Problem | Solution | Learning | |---------+----------+----------| | JSONL index was pretty-printed, not one-per-line | Changed jq -n to jq -cn for compact output | JSONL requires compact JSON per line | | skills-8cc claimed ARGS was unused | Verified with grep - ARGS used on lines 8, 58, 64 | Always verify before removing "dead code" | | Hooks research needed official docs | Used claude-code-guide agent for accurate info | Agent has access to official documentation | | AT-SPI work crossed repo boundaries | Created dotfiles-0l3 issue instead of direct edit | Cross-repo dependencies need proper tracking | * Technical Details ** Code Changes - Total files modified: 4 - Key files changed: - =skills/orch/SKILL.md= - Added conversational patterns section (~95 lines) - =bin/claude-search= - New prototype script (93 lines) - =docs/research/vision-ui-benchmark-2025-12-29.md= - Benchmark results ** New Files Created - =bin/claude-search= - Indexes and searches Claude Code conversation history - =docs/research/vision-ui-benchmark-2025-12-29.md= - Vision benchmark findings ** Commands Used #+begin_src bash # Vision benchmark - capture screenshots niri msg action screenshot-window --id 44 cd ~/proj/skills/skills/playwright-visit && nix develop --command ./scripts/visit.py screenshot "https://github.com" /tmp/ui-test-github.png --wait 2000 # Build claude-search index ~/proj/skills/bin/claude-search --rebuild # Output: Index built: 122 sessions # Search conversation history ~/proj/skills/bin/claude-search "wayland" # Returns matching sessions with date, project, message count # Check beads status bd ready bd show bd close --reason="..." #+end_src ** Architecture Notes - Claude Code stores conversations in =~/.claude/projects//.jsonl= - JSONL contains message types: user, assistant, summary, file-history-snapshot, queue-operation - Summary entries already exist - no need to generate them - Claude Code LSP is plugin-based, not automatic discovery - User has pyright-lsp and gopls-lsp plugins installed * Process and Workflow ** What Worked Well - Rapid issue triage - several closed as invalid or not worth doing - Research-first approach for hooks and LSP questions - Using claude-code-guide agent for accurate Claude Code documentation - User feedback loop on cross-repo work (file issues vs direct changes) ** What Was Challenging - Extract-metrics.sh failed with exit 141 (SIGPIPE) - Initial JSONL indexing produced pretty-printed JSON instead of JSONL - Remote git server still down - 52 commits queued * Learning and Insights ** Technical Insights - Vision models give approximate coordinates, not pixel-precise - Claude Code hooks are synchronous with 60s timeout - not for background work - Claude Code JSONL already has summary entries from compaction - LSP in Claude Code requires explicit plugin installation via /plugin ** Process Insights - Invalid issues happen - verify before acting - "Not worth doing" is a valid close reason for premature optimization - Cross-repo work needs proper issue tracking in both repos ** Architectural Insights - Hybrid AT-SPI + vision is the right desktop automation architecture - Claude Code conversation search can be simple grep on indexed summaries - Plugin-based LSP means per-repo profiles (skills-0f1) may be less relevant * Context for Future Work ** Open Questions - When will git remote come back online? (52 commits queued) - Should claude-search have a SessionEnd hook for auto-indexing? - Are the LSP-related issues (jbo, hh2, e96, etc.) still relevant given plugin architecture? ** Next Steps - Deploy dotfiles when ready (AT-SPI enablement) - Push queued commits when remote recovers - Consider adding full-text search to claude-search - Review LSP issues against Claude Code's plugin-based approach ** Related Work - [[file:2025-12-29-issue-triage-playwright-skill-implementation.org][Earlier 2025-12-29 session]] - playwright-visit, issue triage - [[file:2025-12-28-code-review-skill-creation-worklog-cleanup.org][2025-12-28 session]] - code-review skill, orch patterns origin * Raw Notes - Session started with "what's ready" and worked through P2 issues - Vision benchmark used btop (terminal UI) and GitHub homepage (web UI) - claude-search indexes 122 sessions across 20 projects - Orch skill now documents: sessions, cross-model dialogue, iterative refinement - User explicitly said "no" to checking AT-SPI status - "waiting for deployment" ** Issues Closed This Session | Issue | Title | Resolution | |-------+-------+------------| | skills-ebl | Benchmark vision model UI understanding | Hybrid AT-SPI+vision recommended | | skills-8d9 | Add conversational patterns to orch skill | Added to SKILL.md | | skills-x2l | Investigate hooks for parallel orch queries | Hooks synchronous, not suitable | | skills-6e3 | Searchable Claude Code conversation history | Prototype complete | | skills-8cc | Remove dead code: unused ARGS variable | Invalid - ARGS is used | | skills-r5c | Extract shared logging library from scripts | Not worth it - minimal duplication | * Session Metrics - Commits made: 5 (+ 1 beads sync) - Files touched: 4 - Lines added/removed: +290/-10 (estimated) - Issues closed: 6 - New prototypes: 1 (claude-search) - Research docs: 1 (vision benchmark)