dan/skills
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bd sync: 2026-01-14 11:40:53

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
dan 2026-01-14 11:40:53 -08:00
parent b87fe4c467
commit 2c0db1c911
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
.beads/issues.jsonl
View file

@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
{"id":"skills-8vdo","title":"Handle or log fetch failure in createWorktree","description":"[ERROR] MED git.nim:40 - Fetch failure silently ignored before creating worktree. If fetch fails, branch may be stale. Log warning on fetch failure, or use runGitCheck if required.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2026-01-10T19:52:13.676498678-08:00","created_by":"dan","updated_at":"2026-01-10T20:37:04.747625244-08:00","closed_at":"2026-01-10T20:37:04.747625244-08:00","close_reason":"Implemented consistent error handling strategy"}
{"id":"skills-8xv","title":"Log errors in tryClaim before silent rollback","description":"[ERROR] MED db.nim:243-245 - tryClaim catches CatchableError and silently returns false. Can't distinguish 'already claimed' from 'DB error'. Log exception before rollback.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"bug","created_at":"2026-01-10T18:52:37.323937187-08:00","created_by":"dan","updated_at":"2026-01-10T20:37:04.745229052-08:00","closed_at":"2026-01-10T20:37:04.745229052-08:00","close_reason":"Implemented consistent error handling strategy"}
{"id":"skills-8y6","title":"Define skill versioning strategy","description":"Git SHA alone is insufficient. Need tuple approach:\n\n- skill_source_rev: git SHA (if available)\n- skill_content_hash: hash of SKILL.md + scripts\n- runtime_ref: flake.lock hash or Nix store path\n\nQuestions to resolve:\n- Do Protos pin to versions (stable but maintenance) or float on latest (risky)?\n- How to handle breaking changes in skills?\n- Record in wisp trace vs proto definition?\n\nFrom consensus: both models flagged versioning instability as high severity.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-23T19:49:30.839064445-05:00","updated_at":"2025-12-23T20:55:04.439779336-05:00","closed_at":"2025-12-23T20:55:04.439779336-05:00","close_reason":"ADRs revised with orch consensus feedback"}
{"id":"skills-98q0","title":"Update outdated documentation in skills repo","description":"README.md is missing entries for: doc-review, hq, ops-review, playwright-visit, review-gate. Need to verify status and add them.","status":"open","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","owner":"dan@delpad","created_at":"2026-01-14T11:09:00.399662569-08:00","created_by":"dan","updated_at":"2026-01-14T11:18:10.672561601-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-98q0","title":"Update outdated documentation in skills repo","description":"README.md is missing entries for: doc-review, hq, ops-review, playwright-visit, review-gate. Need to verify status and add them.","status":"closed","priority":2,"issue_type":"task","owner":"dan@delpad","created_at":"2026-01-14T11:09:00.399662569-08:00","created_by":"dan","updated_at":"2026-01-14T11:40:48.285567301-08:00","closed_at":"2026-01-14T11:40:48.285567301-08:00","close_reason":"Closed"}
{"id":"skills-9af","title":"spec-review: Add spike/research task handling","description":"Tasks like 'Investigate X' can linger without clear outcomes.\n\nAdd to REVIEW_TASKS:\n- Flag research/spike tasks\n- Require timebox and concrete outputs (decision record, prototype, risks)\n- Pattern for handling unknowns","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-15T00:23:26.887719136-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-15T14:08:13.441095034-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-15T14:08:13.441095034-08:00"}
{"id":"skills-9bc","title":"Investigate pre-compression hook for worklogs","description":"## Revised Understanding\n\nClaude Code already persists full conversation history in `~/.claude/projects/\u003cproject\u003e/\u003csession-id\u003e.jsonl`. Pre-compact hooks aren't needed for data capture.\n\n## Question\nWhat's the ideal workflow for generating worklogs from session data?\n\n## Options\n\n### 1. Post-session script\n- Run after exiting Claude Code\n- Reads most recent session JSONL\n- Generates worklog from conversation content\n- Pro: Async, doesn't interrupt flow\n- Con: May forget to run it\n\n### 2. On-demand slash command\n- `/worklog-from-session` or similar\n- Reads current session's JSONL file\n- Generates worklog with full context\n- Pro: Explicit control\n- Con: Still need to remember\n\n### 3. Pre-compact reminder\n- Hook prints reminder: \"Consider running /worklog\"\n- Doesn't automate, just nudges\n- Pro: Simple, non-intrusive\n- Con: Easy to dismiss\n\n### 4. Async batch processing\n- Process old sessions whenever\n- All data persists in JSONL files\n- Pro: No urgency, can do later\n- Con: Context may be stale\n\n## Data Format\nSession files contain:\n- User messages with timestamp\n- Assistant responses with model info\n- Tool calls and results\n- Git branch, cwd, version info\n\n## Next Steps\n- Decide preferred workflow\n- Build script to parse session JSONL → worklog format","status":"closed","priority":3,"issue_type":"task","created_at":"2025-12-17T14:32:32.568430817-08:00","updated_at":"2025-12-17T15:56:38.864916015-08:00","closed_at":"2025-12-17T15:56:38.864916015-08:00","close_reason":"Pivoted: worklogs may be redundant given full conversation persistence. New approach: make conversations searchable directly."}
{"id":"skills-9cu","title":"ops-review skill","description":"Multi-lens review skill for operational infrastructure (Nix, shell, Docker, CI/CD).\n\nBased on code-review pattern with linter-first hybrid architecture.\n\n## Phases\n- Phase 1: Skeleton + Core Safety (secrets, shell-safety, blast-radius, privilege)\n- Phase 2: Reliability (idempotency, supply-chain, observability)\n- Phase 3: Architecture (nix-hygiene, resilience, orchestration)\n\n## Design\nSee specs/ops-review/plan.md\n\n## Success Criteria\n- Review dotfiles/ and find real issues\n- Review prox-setup/ and find real issues\n- \u003c10% false positive rate on Phase 1\n- Quick mode \u003c30s","status":"closed","priority":1,"issue_type":"epic","created_at":"2026-01-01T16:55:15.772440374-05:00","created_by":"dan","updated_at":"2026-01-02T00:02:23.095920957-05:00","closed_at":"2026-01-02T00:02:23.095920957-05:00","close_reason":"All 10 lenses implemented with orch consensus. Testing delegated to target repos (dotfiles-je5, prox-setup-kqg)."}