Review this task breakdown for a software feature before it becomes tracked issues.

The tasks were generated from an implementation plan. Analyze:

1. GRANULARITY
   - Are tasks appropriately sized? (Not too big, not too small)
   - Can each task be completed in a reasonable time?
   - Should any tasks be split or combined?

2. COMPLETENESS
   - Do tasks cover everything in the plan?
   - Any gaps in coverage?
   - Missing tasks for error handling, testing, documentation?

3. DEPENDENCIES
   - Is the ordering logical?
   - Are dependencies between tasks clear?
   - Any tasks that should be parallelizable but aren't?
   - Circular dependencies?

4. CLARITY
   - Is each task description clear and actionable?
   - Would someone else understand what "done" means?
   - Any vague or ambiguous tasks?

5. SCOPE
   - Do all tasks trace back to the plan?
   - Any gold-plating or unnecessary tasks?
   - Any tasks that belong in a different feature?

For each issue found:
- BLOCKER or SUGGESTION (blockers must be fixed before bd create)
- Quote the problematic task
- Explain the problem
- Suggest how to fix it

These tasks are about to become tracked issues. Catch problems now.
